🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.